Supermarkets urged to stop plugging junk
The heavy promotion of junk foods by Australia’s biggest supermarkets is encouraging poor dietary habits, particularly among shoppers living in areas of socioeconomic disadvantage, a new study has found. Researchers from Deakin University’s Global Obesity Centre found supermarkets promote soft drinks, chips, chocolates and lollies by giving these products more shelf space. They also discount them more frequently than healthier options and place them prominently in end-of-aisle displays and near checkouts.
Lead researcher Associate Professor Gary Sacks says the study found that it was almost impossible to pay for groceries without being exposed to unhealthy food and drinks. In fact, eighty percent of end-of-aisle displays for food and drinks contain unhealthy items.
“The recent rush on products during the pandemic highlighted the role of supermarkets as the main source of food for most Australian households,” he says. “We also know that up to 35 percent of what Australians eat is unhealthy. If we are to improve Australian diets, we need supermarkets to play a greater role in encouraging people to select healthy options.”
Steps towards a better diet
The report further identified that supermarkets can help Australians start moving toward more healthy and nutritious diets by:
1. Providing healthier checkouts that do not display chocolate and soft drinks
2. Replacing unhealthy items with healthy food and drinks at end-of-aisle displays
3. Allocating less shelf-space to unhealthy items
4. Offering fewer discounts on unhealthy food and drinks
The survey findings are the result of in-store audits of 104 stores throughout Victoria. This includes 26 Woolworths supermarkets, 26 Coles supermarkets, 26 Aldi supermarkets and 26 independent supermarkets.
Don’t push it
Researchers measured shelf space allocated to foods on display at checkouts, as well as end-of-aisle displays and the price promotions of healthy versus unhealthy foods.
“Aldi stores were less likely to promote unhealthy foods at end-of-aisle displays and checkouts compared to the other major chains,” Sacks says. “But there was little difference between Coles and Woolworths on key indicators of in-store healthiness.
“A major concern was that, on some measures, supermarkets in more socioeconomically disadvantaged areas were less healthy than those in less disadvantaged areas. People living with socioeconomic disadvantage have higher rates of diet-related diseases. They’re also less likely to eat healthy food and are more likely to overeat unhealthy food. The extent to which unhealthy food is pushed at us shouldn’t depend on the suburb in which we live.”
Shaking up our supermarkets
The two healthiest stores in the study were both independent stores with abundant fresh food and few promotional displays for unhealthy food and drinks. Sacks says this demonstrates that a healthier supermarket environment is possible.
“We need all Australian supermarkets to set higher standards relating to food promotion,” he says. “If supermarkets and the processed food industry don’t take action to improve their practices, then government should be ready to step in to ensure the supermarket environment encourages more healthy choices.”
Key findings of the report:
1. Unhealthy food was present at 90% of all staff-assisted checkouts.
2. Chocolate, confectionery and unhealthy drinks were the most common types of food displayed at checkouts.
3. Food on special at checkouts was 7.5 times more likely to be unhealthy than healthy.
4. Of all end-of–aisles that displayed food and drinks, 80% had at least one type of unhealthy item. The top types of food displayed were chocolate, confectionery and chips.
5. The proportion of shelf space allocated to selected unhealthy food and beverages (compared with fruit and vegetables) in the most disadvantaged areas was nearly 10% higher than in the least disadvantaged areas.